The power of III

Summum ius summa iniuria--More law, less justice
--Cicero.
Showing posts with label Keynesian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Keynesian. Show all posts

26 March 2011

400,000 leftists march in London, decry austerity, destroy private property, demand government spends more

More government spending: It's worked in the past, right?  Why wouldn't it work again?
 



I’ve just watched the soi-disant “March for the Alternative” snaking its way across London. It is clear enough, from the banners and slogans, what the protesters are against: spending restraint, open markets, private enterprise, property rights, free contract, Tories, bankers and Nick Clegg. Fair enough. But what are they for?

Their website suggests that they think the answer to our debt crisis is more spending. In fact, they don’t think we have much of a debt crisis. They want higher taxes, particularly for the rich, whom they expect to wait around meekly to be fleeced. And they insist that higher state expenditure (”investment”) will create more jobs. [I love this next bit--HM] Why so half-hearted, comrades? Why not go all the way, nationalise every business, place every adult on the state payroll and confiscate all income? By your logic, it would surely make Britain the most prosperous country on Earth.

Read the whole of MEP Hannan's blog post at The Telegraph.co.uk
 -------------------------------------------

Here's my take on today's London mass protest:

Those protesters are unfortunate.

They were raised to a life made easier through use of other people's money (tax monies). They, like their labor union counterparts in the US (as seen in Wisconson), are now starting to appreciate that the privileges to which they consider themselves to be entitled can now stop like a faucet being turned off.

The time of false prosperity, which has lasted for decades, is coming crashing down.  The time for austerity has arrived for the West, perhaps the whole world.   

The left-wing youth and their political mouthpieces and pundits wont go quietly into the night.  Watch the University age students wearing black scarves and Guy Fawkes masks kick at the windows of the Ritz Hotel on Picadilly.  How does that help their cause?  Destroying someone else's private property is a way for hotheads to blow off steam.  But it also shows a penchant to destroy wealth, an unintended metaphor for the economics of their own "alternative" to government austerity.

Among other similar demands ("higher spending") they want higher taxes for the rich.  

They don't think of this as confiscation of wealth that someone else produced by the sweat of their own brow.  They wouldn't think of doing it to their neighbor in the same row house in Brixton or East London.  

Somehow it's OK if the person has more money than they do.  Their labor produced the wealth of the rich person:  the rich person couldn't have possibly made the money through their own effort, right?  When the rich person is deprived of their wealth by the "people", the rich person's employees will have less wages, or no jobs.  They rob Peter to pay Paul.  They auto-cannibalize their own economy.  Their movement is driven by self-interest, but don't realize that what they propose will only hurt the economy and themselves.


They need to fight for an end of the Corporatist State, central banking,  the use of tax money for special interests, and Keynesian governmental economic policy.  

Decreased taxes, decreased government regulation,  and less government interference in economic matters will begin the return to prosperity.  It will come at the suffering of many, especially the working class.  Think of it as economic chemotherapy: Makes you sick as hell before it can make you better.


-----------------------

Other bloggers have their favorite phrases to inspire and remind their readers. Arctic Patriot is known for his : "Resist", to which Kerodin adds his: "Reinforce.  Reload.  Ruckus.  Restoration."

Here's one of mine you'll see from time to time: 

Economic knowledge should dictate your politics.

“The state is the great fictitious entity by which everyone seeks to live at the expense of everyone else.”--Frederic Bastiat

"A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers."--Friedrich August von Hayek

"The system of discriminatory taxation universally accepted under the misleading name of progressive taxation of income and inheritance is not a mode of taxation. It is rather a mode of disguised expropriation."--Ludwig von Mises 

24 February 2011

Someone at the Fed has been reading LewRockwell.com!

...probably not.  But it does sound like (too late) the most internally critical Fed Bank President has taken an Austrian economic stance on Fed policy:

"A top Federal Reserve official Wednesday said the U.S. central bank was risking a new financial crisis with its easy-money policies and urged regulators to break up the biggest banks.
Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank President Thomas Hoenig, one of the Fed's most outspoken internal critics, warned monetary policy should be tailored "so you don't overshoot and cause the next crisis."


Same story as reported at ZeroHedge.com:




  • HOENIG SAYS U.S. HAS `DEEPLY' UNDERMINED FREE-MARKET CAPITALISM







  • HOENIG WARNS OF ESCALATING SERIES OF CRISES WITH RISING COSTS







  • HOENIG: LARGE FINANCIAL FIRMS CAN EXPECT BAILOUTS IN FUTURE







  • HOENIG SAYS BIG FINANCIAL FIRMS MUST NOT HOLD ECONOMY `HOSTAGE'







  • HOENIG:BIG FIRMS `HAVE SIGNIFICANT INCENTIVES' TO INCREASE RISK







  • HOENIG: TOO-BIG-TO-FAIL FIRMS POSE `GREATEST RISK' TO ECONOMY







  • HOENIG: LARGE FIRMS WERE `GAMING' CAPITAL STANDARDS PRE-CRISIS







  • HOENIG SAYS BIG FINANCIAL FIRMS ENJOY `HUGE' FUNDING ADVANTAGE




  • UPDATE:  Yesterday I got one hit from the Federal Reserve in Kansas City;  so now I can legitimately claim: 

    "Someone at the Fed has been reading the Bonnie Blue Blog."

    11 January 2011

    Keynesian economic policy almost destroys Sweden; economy saved by frugality since '92

     Which, of course, is a principle of Austrian economics.

    "...there has been no job creation at all in the private sector from 1950 to 2005.
    Yes, you read that correctly: there was no net increase in the number of jobs in the private sector in Sweden over a period of 55 years. In other words, starting five years after the end of the Second World War, the Swedish economy was at a complete standstill."

    Read the rest at mises.org blog

    10 January 2011

    Was Einstein thinking of Keynsian quantitative easing when he said:

    "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results..."

    ----------------------------------------------

    Just wondering...

    Fed's policy favors the rich, the poor languish.

    I don't know about y'all, but I don't have any extra cash lying around to spread around Saks, Nordstrom, and Tiffany's.

     "There is a telling detail in the US retail chain store data for December. Stephen Lewis from Monument Securities points out that luxury outlets saw an 8.1pc rise from a year ago, but discount stores catering to America’s poorer half rose just 1.2pc.
    Tiffany’s, Nordstrom, and Saks Fifth Avenue are booming. Sales of Cadillac cars have jumped 35pc, while Porsche’s US sales are up 29pc.
    Cartier and Louis Vuitton have helped boost the luxury goods stock index by almost 50pc since October. Yet Best Buy, Target, and Walmart have languished.

    Such is the blighted fruit of Federal Reserve policy. The Fed no longer even denies that the purpose of its latest blast of bond purchases, or QE2, is to drive up Wall Street, perhaps because it has so signally failed to achieve its other purpose of driving down borrowing costs." 

    From Ambrose Evans-Pritchard of The Telegraph in the United Kingdom.

    I thought of this quote when I was reading the article:

    Stephen: [to William Wallace] "God tells me he can get me out of this mess, but he's pretty sure you're fucked."

    Austrian economic interpretation:  

    Those with cash would rather have tangible goods than hold onto cash that will lose it's value secondary to impending inflation.  

    Productive elements in society cannot hire workers secondary to lack of orders or capital (minimal lending from banks, tighter controls on lending) to expand business.

    20 December 2010

    Iceland recovery supports Austrian School Economic Theory

    The government did not bail out it's failing banks.  The recovery was painful but relatively quick.  The people of Iceland did not bear the brunt of the debts incurred by private institutions, as the Keynesians and Socialists have insisted upon in Europe and the United States.

    Here is Daniel Hannan, blogging in The Telegraph.


    Imprudent granting of credit is bound to prove just as ruinous to a bank as to any other merchant.

    Ludwig von Mises.











































































































    16 December 2010

    Which economists "get it"? Austrian vs. Keynesian?

    Those schooled in Austrian Economics:
    Ludwig von Mises was right.


    One such blogger/pundit/commentator of the Austrian school is Gonzalo Lira;  see him compare and contrast the different governmental approaches to solve the debt crises in Ireland vs Iceland.  Without mentioning Mises, Keynes, or any other economic theory, he describes why the Austrian approach is successful, and gives another example of a Keynesian failure:



    Iceland recovers faster, with expected pain, in a short time, when malinvested monies and debts are liquidated.  The taxpayer in Iceland is not expected to pay for the debt assumed by a private bank.  Unemployment dips fast, then recovers fast, in a V shaped curve.



    Ireland's leadership in Dublin, and their masters in Brussels, take the Keynesian approach to the problem, increasing but spreading out the suffering by propping up failed or failing private financial institutions.  This is done by spreading the debt to the tax-paying public by guaranteeing debt by the government (local taxpayer money), or IMF or EU funds (foreign taxpayer money).  This only prolongs an inevitable correction, when even greater debts must be dealt with.  Quantitative easing/increasing the money supply or any other term you wish to apply devalues the currency and allows the debt to be paid off in cheaper currency.  Capital is drained from the productive portion of the economy, and businesses stagnate and contract.  Unemployment assumes an L shaped curve at best.

    Keynesian approaches to solving economic problems can only continue for so long.

    Think of it as auto-cannibalism:  In order to support your brain and your heart and other vital organs, you eat your hands, arms, feet, legs, and so on.  IMF or EU funds is like finding another body nearby on which to feed, but in doing so you sap that body as well.  It cannot go on indefinitely.  Either a country must deal with its debt by paying it off, or must declare insolvency and liquidate the debt.

    (Relevant article: MEP of the UK Conservative Party and friend of the Austrian school of economics and libertarians in general Daniel Hannan write about Ireland here.)

    Up til now the Keynesians' debt has been put off until future generations.  The bill has come due.



    The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. 
    --John Maynard Keynes


    I work for a Government I despise for ends I think criminal.
    --John Maynard Keynes